Bringing a Becker Lens to Political Messaging

During the 2016 campaign season, the Ernest Becker Foundation invited you to join us in examining the underlying messages in the images, words, and sounds of political advertising, specifically those messages that provoke our subconscious fear of death. Becker famously argued that our death anxiety influences our choices and behaviors, stating in Pulitzer Prize-winning, The Denial of Death, “the idea of death, the fear of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else.” More than 30 years of psychological research has provided empirical evidence validating that claim, today known as Terror Management Theory. We wanted to look at how death anxiety played out in the presidential campaign season and election.

Our purpose is not to support one political party against another. Both major parties use fear and anxiety to rouse our emotions because it’s an effective tool of persuasion, and persuasion is the goal of all advertising. Instead, our hope is that viewing political advertisements through a “Becker lens” will enable us to recognize when our subconscious emotions and anxieties are being used to coax our political support.


 Becker, Briefly: The Source and Impact of Death Anxiety

Becker described human beings as caught in a paradox: We have a powerful drive to survive, but also, an amazing ability to reflect on things as they are and to envision possibilities that might be. This capacity feeds human creativity, which has greatly expanded our ability to adapt, invent, and survive. It is also the source of our awareness of death.

  1. The problem is not just that we’re going to die and we know it. Becker argued that our greatest fear is that our lives will not only be too brief, but also, too insignificant. This arouses in us a gnawing sense of inadequacy, a feeling that there’s something missing, something wrong with us. This is “death anxiety” and although it’s mostly unconscious, it’s a core motivation in human behavior.

  2. We cope with death anxiety by trying to give meaning to our lives, to accomplish something of enduring value—something “heroic” that attests to our worth. We learn how to do that from our culture. “Culture” refers to those modes of living that humans have created to give structure, value, and significance to our collective and individual lives, and we live in lots of them: from a national culture to a neighborhood culture, from a favorite sports team to a favorite band. Cultures are also formed through our ethnic, religious, political and professional affiliations, and each of our “cultures” influences our values and our identity. But the cultures we identify with the most seems “heroic” to us and these cultures determine the measures of our success and value as individuals. In each case, what our culture values, we come to value and to desire for ourselves, and we fulfill our desires by achieving those things that culture values most. Our success in that effort yields a feeling Becker referred to as “heroism,” and it invests our lives with transcendent meanings such as, duty to our nation, service to God, the enrichment and endurance of our value system, our community, our family. This gives us a feeling that we’ve accomplished something that doesn’t die when we do, but contributes to and lives on with our culture, enabling us, at least symbolically, to transcend death through heroic achievement.

  3. Our life’s meaning and our very identity are deeply tied to the rightness and goodness of the culture(s) we identify with. Thus, it’s not uncommon to feel discomfort when we encounter other cultures or people whose values and beliefs differ from our own. But when we sense that our culture or its values are overshadowed or threatened by another, our death anxiety can intensify dramatically. Because we believe in the superiority of our culture, any other is by definition inferior, illegitimate or evil. We attempt to degrade or even destroy the threatening other. We seek or create narratives that “set the record straight” and affirm our rightful place at the top of the heap. Further, we are drawn to leaders and sources of power that we believe can defend us, stake our claim, provide salvation, defeat and punish the menacing other. As our death anxiety escalates, we see a dire situation in which even normally unacceptable risks must be taken and sacrifices made to protect what is most valuable, significant and meaningful. We fear that if we fail, all will be lost.

And so, although Becker identified death anxiety as a creative force in the development of positive human institutions and achievements, he warned that death anxiety can also arouse and legitimate our drive to attack and even destroy whatever or whoever threatens those individual and collective sources of meaning. Death anxiety is a powerful motivator, for good and for for ill.


Anyone who is a fan of democracy should be very concerned by the fact that a relatively subtle alteration of psychological conditions can have such profound effects on political preferences.

Sheldon Solomon on the strong findings that reveal mortality salience increases voter support for ‘charismatic leaders,’ including George W. Bush and Donald Trump

Death Anxiety in Political Messages

At their best, the institutions and activities of culture offer avenues for creating a better world. However, our motives for participating in them are invariably influenced by our mostly unconscious fear of death. Because of this, we are vulnerable to negative consequences of death anxiety; we are prone to irrational exaggeration and overreaction and we often entrench ourselves defensively and aggressively against those we perceive as opponents or threats. The world of politics is no exception. Political ads often speak to our inner longing for meaning. They tap into our quest to make a difference, if only by throwing our support behind the right leader who promises us heroic triumph over insignificance by heroism by strengthening us financially, politically or militarily, and by promoting our culture, values or religion. Conversely, political ads warn that the wrong leader might threaten our well-being and put at risk all we believe in and stand for. To protect ourselves from impending disaster, we’re urged to resist, to fight back against such leaders, their policies and even their followers.

Demagogues and propagandists of all strains have learned with increasing effectiveness just how to present themselves and their ideas so as to appeal to our hopes while maximizing our fears and anxieties. They compel us to support people and programs by manipulating our unconscious emotions rather than appealing to our rational assent. They promise a taste of heroism to alleviate our death anxiety, but the promise is often empty, and the price, high.


Common Motifs in Political Advertising Viewed Through a Becker Lens

Political ads skillfully connect to the anxieties, fears, longings, and aspirations that Becker identified as stemming from our most primal anxiety about mortality and the inevitability of death. In what follows, we identify four motifs that commonly show up in these ads. We invite you to participate with us in using a Becker lens to examine them, and in thinking through the implications of being psychologically manipulated by political messaging. We have identified four types of political ad content that have the potential to manipulate voters’ decision making.

Conclusion

As humans, we don’t like to dwell on our human frailty for good reason: Everything in us protests the inevitability of the end of life. Our lives are filled with beauty and wonder, and with suffering and sorrow, too. But on the whole, death feels like a great injustice, and so our energy is directed toward fending off death, at all costs. The anxiety this feeling generates makes us vulnerable. That vulnerability makes us susceptible to all kinds of manipulations, including manipulations performed by the political machinery of our culture.

Our earnest hope is that we have unveiled the reasons why emotional and psychological manipulation happens so easily and so persistently, especially in the political arena. We also hope that by peering into the most basic and primal motivations of the human experience, we can more readily recognize the manipulations in political messages and make the effort to reflect more thoughtfully on their language, tone and potential emotional impact. To that end, we invite you to analyze current presidential campaign ads with the themes in mind that we have laid out here, and we invite you to suggest ads that would be useful for such analysis.


Authors

Merlyn Mowry

Merlyn Mowrey (Ph.D., Temple University) teaches social ethics in the Department of Philosophy and Religion at Central Michigan University. Her courses examine issues at the intersection of ethics, culture, and religion, including “Violence and Religion,” and “Death and Dying.” Since 2000, she has participated in numerous projects of the Ernest Becker Foundation.

Kyle Roberts

Kyle Roberts (Ph.D.) is Schilling Professor of Public Theology and the Church and Economic Life at United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities. Roberts has published essays on Kierkegaard and modern theology, and other collected volumes on various topics, including Pietism, Karl Barth, and Christian spirituality.

Daniel Liechty

Daniel Liechty (Ph.D.) is a Professor in the School of Social Work at Illinois State University, where he teaches courses on Human Development in the Social Environment. He keeps his fingers in a number of pies, and has been referred to good naturedly as the Dean of Ernest Becker Studies.

Additional Contributors

Kirby Farrell, Matt Motta, Matt Motyl, Sheldon Solomon